The Upside of Social Media Narcissism

The Upside of Social Media Narcissism
SUBSCRIBE to BrainCraft! Click here: http://ow.ly/rt5IE Talking psychology, neuroscience & why we act the way we do. New video every other week!

Could a slight rise in narcissism from increased use of social media actually make us better, more self-aware people?

Follow us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Braincraft
Tumblr http://braincraft.tumblr.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/Brain_Craft
Instagram http://instagram.com/brain_craft
Google+ https://www.google.com/+braincraftvideo

BrainCraft is created by Vanessa Hill. Say hello on Twitter https://twitter.com/nessyhill

References:

Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology letters, 2(3), 412-414.

Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and individual differences, 52(4), 482-486.

Covey, M. K., Saladin, S., & Killen, P. J. (1989). Self-monitoring, surveillance, and incentive effects on cheating. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(5), 673-679.

Diener, E., & Wallbom, M. (1976). Effects of self-awareness on antinormative behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 10(1), 107-111.

Heine, S. J., Takemoto, T., Moskalenko, S., Lasaleta, J., & Henrich, J. (2008). Mirrors in the head: Cultural variation in objective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 879-887.

Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364.

Ong, E. Y., Ang, R. P., Ho, J., Lim, J. C., Goh, D. H., Lee, C. S., & Chua, A. Y. (2011). Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 180-185.

Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Keith Campbell, W., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos Inflating Over Time: A Cross‐Temporal Meta‐Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of personality, 76(4), 875-902.

Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Further evidence of an increase in narcissism among college students.Journal of Personality, 76(4), 919-928.

Wicklund, R. A. (1979). The influence of self-awareness on human behavior: The person who becomes self-aware is more likely to act consistently, be faithful to societal norms, and give accurate reports about himself. American Scientist, 67(2), 187-193.

Music: Bass Walker by Kevin MacLeod/http://incompetech.com

Contagion, Affirmation and Lies: The Psychology of Social Media

Contagion, Affirmation and Lies: The Psychology of Social Media
Views of how social media can affect people are often over-generalized (“its ruining our conversational skills!” versus “its going to spark revolutions to rid the world of dictators!”), as is often the case with new technologies. The degree to which social media are embedded in our everyday lives makes this impulse all the more powerful. In the present talk, we’ll go over some of the most recent research from our group that examines how social media can have subtle but powerful effects on a range of psychological dynamics. The talk will cover how emotional contagion can take place over text-based communication, how social media can boost self-esteem and self-affirmation while degrading performance on a math test, and modify the way we lie (and tell the truth) to one another. The talk will include several activities designed to illuminate the key principles derived from the experimental findings that I will present, so be prepared to have your emotions infected, your sense of self improved, and to be lied to.

School of Psychology at the University of Kent

School of Psychology at the University of Kent
Find out more about studying Psychology at Kent through our website: https://www.kent.ac.uk/psychology/index.html

You can also keep up-to-date with developments in the School of Psychology through social media:
Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/universityofkentpsychology/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/KentPsychology
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/uniofkentpsychology/

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Social Media Training-Psychology of Social Media Pt. 1 by Doug Firebaugh

Social Media Training-Psychology of Social Media Pt. 1 by Doug Firebaugh
http://www.passionfire.com
http://socialmediatrainingnetwork.com
http://socialmediablogster.com
http://networkmarketingtraininginstitute.com

MLM training Network Marketing Success from DOUG FIREBAUGH Social Media Web 2.0 Training site for home business and direct sales professionals with recruiting, leadership, and how to’s for multi level marketers, mlm distributors and consultants, and work from home moms involved with online internet marketing.

Respecting Social Media Psychology

Respecting Social Media Psychology
Get our real estate and mortgage videos weekly for free: http://www.theREsource.tv

Cliff Nass: The psychology of media and its implications

Cliff Nass: The psychology of media and its implications
Great user experiences depend on socially-intelligent interfaces that harmonize a person’s real identity with his or her “digital persona.” The digital persona informs the social signaling mechanisms.

Cliff Nass shares the work done at the Stanford CHIMe Lab over the last decade, which has provided insights to inform the design of interfaces.

mediaX Media Contact: Susana Montes, susanam@stanford.edu
Video by: Richard Townsend for mediaX at Stanford University

THE HIVE MIND – CROWD PSYCHOLOGY – Why Social Media Failed

THE HIVE MIND – CROWD PSYCHOLOGY – Why Social Media Failed
The Hive Mind – Crowd Psychology – What lies behind collective thought and reason – Why Social Media Failed – the crowd, a study of the popular mind – french social psychologist sociologist gustave le bon – crowd herd behaviour – twitter facebook reddit – marina joyce – no man’s sky hype anger lies rage – hysterical crowds masses – hypnotized – forums – maniac mob – stock market crash reason – primitive barbaric behaviour in masses groups crowds – Why crowds go crazy fast – Why there is so much anger on the internet web – Witchhunt Witchhunts

Gustave Le Bon – The Crowd – on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2bIQrop

Central mass psychological theses
Types of materials:
A. Dissimilar materials (foules hétérogènes)
1. nameless masses (as street collections)
2. Not nameless (for example, jury, Parliament)
B. Similar masses (foules homogeneous)
1. sects (political, religious, others)
2. Case (military, priests, workers box, etc.)
3. Classes (citizens, farmers, etc.).
Nature, function and evaluation of the mass:
A mass is basically impulsive, mobile, irritable, suggestible, gullible, obsessed with exaggerated and ingenious ideas, intolerant and dictatorial.
Mass transport mainly ideas and cultural objectives that are only realized by the few who can keep from mass distance.
The individual can only in the mass ascend to heights or sink down into depths (mostly the latter).
Origin of mass is the mass psyche that emerges again from a racial soul than the common, inherited cultural substrate.
Anglo-Saxon masses react differently Romanesque, often show even contradictory ways of reacting.
Modern materials are mainly characterized by a boundless egotism, brings decay and spiritually barren mob rule with him.
The emerging mass age has to be assessed negatively, as here now overpowering masses are no longer bound by ideals, traditions and institutions.
Suggestibility and gullibility:
The members of a mass forfeit the critical faculties of which they have as individuals. Your personality vanishes.
The mass may not differ from factual Personal.
They succumb easily suggestions, their effect of hypnosis is similar, and is hysterical; it is easy to steer.
Therefore, it is also susceptible to legends that deal with most heroic leaders and events.
The opinion in the mass is carried out by mental contagion.
Intelligence, emotion and bias:
The mass is only slightly intelligent.
She thinks one side rough and undifferentiated in both good and evil.
The mass does not think logically but in images, which are often caused by simple voice symbolism.
The mass is easily excitable, gullible and erratic. Your emotion is simple.
Judgments, actions and beliefs of the mass:
The ground is very conservative in general.
The mass can not be convinced by logical arguments, but only emotional.
The mass is sometimes disinterested, possibly also virtuous or heroic, then often in the exuberance.
The mass is intolerant and domineering.
You can be very cruel, far beyond the individuals Possible addition, and is given suitable guidance willing to revolutions.
The core beliefs of the mass change only very slowly.
The moral judgments of a mass independent of the origin or the intellect of its members.
The mass judging by hasty generalization of individual cases.
Your beliefs quickly take on religious overtones and often based on wishful thinking.
Leader of masses:
Guides and ideas are rapidly charismatic properties (Nimbus or “prestige”).
Without a guide, the composition is as a flock without a shepherd.
Leaders are not thinkers, but men of action, occasionally one finds among them nervous, irritable and half crazy.
Leaders often act through a great eloquence. Great leaders can awaken a faith and thus control entire nations.
Guide rule is usually violently.
There are two types of leaders: effective short-term and long-term. That depends on the perseverance of her will.
Leaders act primarily through three methods: assertion, repetition and contagion and transmission, whose best-known effect is the imitation.
If a leader does not work, it quickly loses its aura and goes under.

Gaming Videos Streams [ENG] – Like, Subscribe and Share! Youtube: geistreiches Twitter: geistreiches PSN: geistreiches Mephisto ist mein Haustier http://twitter.com/geistreiches

NEWS & REVIEWS: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC7XTkcOo-UmuxweWGxb9Ovz4gTuaoeGk
BEST OF: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC7XTkcOo-UlP2XygHaZuANbCqZEUJ64M
CINEMATICS: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC7XTkcOo-UnxqGiL0H5pwsqeGzH88x1J
COMMENTARY: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC7XTkcOo-Unj5PdnEIqurUQKPO3csg0A
HOW TO | TIPS | TRICKS | GUIDES: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC7XTkcOo-Uk5gtKrWxyQWx7or0WQ-phA

Dr. Rachna Jain – Interview on using social psychology to boost online visibility

Dr. Rachna Jain – Interview on using social psychology to boost online visibility
http://OnlineVisibilitySecrets.com/7day – Denise Wakeman, founder of The Blog Squad interviews Dr. Rachna Jain on why it’s important to pay attention to aspects of social psychology when building your platform of visibility on the Web. Dr. Jain give examples from studies and talks about “priming” your marketing messages on your social networking sites. Be sure to watch the entire video to see how you can get a free audio program on psychology and social media!

Get a free 7 day mini course on with easy-to-implement tips for boosting your visibility on the web: http://OnlineVisibilitySecrets.com/7day

The Social Psychology of Leftist Mass Hysteria (Part 1)

The Social Psychology of Leftist Mass Hysteria (Part 1)
I take a look into the riots, protests and the media narratives associated with them that have occurred over the past few months, against Trump and the right, including the alt-right in particular, and the social psychological involved, particularly as it concerns anonymity, social identity/self-categorization, inter-group relations, cult-like behavior, and stigma.

You can gib shekels on Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/AydinPaladin

References
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 5(4), 432.
Asch, M. J. (1951). Nondirective teaching in psychology: An experimental study. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 65(4),
Askevis-Leherpeux, F., Schiaratura, L. T., & Douilliez, C. (2012). The effect of mood on the expression of stereotypes as a function of normative pressure. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 25(2), 41-57.
Badea, C., Jetten, J., Czukor, G., & Askevis‐Leherpeux, F. (2010). The bases of identification: When optimal distinctiveness needs face social identity threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 21-41.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders. Studies in the sociology of deviance. Simon and Schuster.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?. Journal of social issues, 55(3), 429-444.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 276-298.
Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(4), 603-610.
Diener, E. (1977). Deindividuation: Causes and consequences. Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 143-155.
Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster.
Jung, C. G. (1968). Analytical psychology: its theory and practice (The Tavistock lectures). New York: Random House.
Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(6), 787-789.
Miller, K. P., Brewer, M. B., & Arbuckle, N. L. (2009). Social identity complexity: Its correlates and antecedents. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 79-94.
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J.C. Turner, M.A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S.D. Reicher, & M.S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford and Newyork: Basil Blackwell
Oakes, P.J, Turner, J.C., & Haslam. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The roles of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
Parker, M. T., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2013). Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup “hate,” not just ingroup “love”. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 81-96.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 65-85.
Salander, P. (2000). Using beliefs and magical thinking to fight cancer distress—a case study. Psycho‐Oncology, 9(1), 40-43.
Spears, R. (2017). Social identity model of deindividuation effects. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65– 93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.),Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Turner, J., (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J., Oakes, P., Haslam, A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463
Turner, J., & Oakes, P.(1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 237–252. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2p2), 1.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

BG Music:

The Social Media War on the Psyche : Reactance

The Social Media War on the Psyche : Reactance
Social media has become a den of censorship, with free expression resulting in everything from soft “shadowbans” to outright bans and silencing. In this video I cover the topic of psychological reactance and how it related to social media, censorship, including self-censorship, and the future of free speech on the Internet.

You can gib shekels on Patreon:
www.patreon.com/AydinPaladin

References:
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of abnormal psychology, 87(1), 49.
Behrouzian, G., Nisbet, E. C., Dal, A., & Çarkoğlu, A. (2016). Resisting censorship: How citizens navigate closed media environments. International Journal of Communication, 10, 23.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.
Epstein, R., Robertson, R., Shepherd, S., Zhang, S. (2017) A method for detecting bias in search rankings, with evidence of systematic bias related to the 2016 presidential election. Paper presented at the 97th annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, CA, April 27.
Kuran, T. (1993). The unthinkable and the unthought. Rationality and Society, 5(4), 473-505.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975) Helplessness. San Francisco, C.A. Freeman.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1972). Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine. 23 (1): 407–412.
Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
Worchel, S., & Arnold, S. E. (1973). The effects of censorship and attractiveness of the censor on attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(4), 365-377.
Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, 277-336.
Zhong, Z. J., Wang, T., & Huang, M. (2017). Does the great fire wall cause self-censorship? The effects of perceived internet regulation and the justification of regulation. Internet Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2016-0204

Sources:
https://goo.gl/kR8ArW
https://goo.gl/qX8P6i
https://goo.gl/bDEI2w
https://goo.gl/UpekSW
https://goo.gl/y2h75D
https://goo.gl/kJJuNT
https://goo.gl/xgJ2oW
https://goo.gl/KVtfsZ
https://goo.gl/eb5d7S
https://goo.gl/EpDetd
https://goo.gl/khYmwT
https://goo.gl/yAaYi1